The emerging role of trogocytosis in the evasion of cancers and parasitic protists from immune cells
Editorial Commentary

The emerging role of trogocytosis in the evasion of cancers and parasitic protists from immune cells

Kumiko Nakada-Tsukui1, Tomoyoshi Nozaki2

1Department of Parasitology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan; 2Department of Biomedical Chemistry, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Correspondence to: Kumiko Nakada-Tsukui. Department of Parasitology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Toyama 1-23-1, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8640, Japan. Email:; Tomoyoshi Nozaki. Department of Biomedical Chemistry, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8654, Japan. Email:

Comment on: Hamieh M, Dobrin A, Cabriolu A, et al. CAR T cell trogocytosis and cooperative killing regulate tumour antigen escape. Nature 2019;568:112-6.

Received: 25 January 2020; Accepted: 20 February 2020; Published: 31 March 2020.

doi: 10.21037/biotarget.2020.03.02

The word of “trogocytosis” started to be used in immunology since 2003. The word “trogo” means “nibble” or “chew” in Greek, and trogocytosis represents a mode of internalization of a part of a neighboring cell, which is a distinct manner from conventional “phago”cytosis, meaning, as we understood, “eat” with one bite. After the report in 1972 (1), in which transfer of major histocompatibility complex II (MHC class II) from B to T cells was observed, a similar mode of transfer of surface molecules has been reported for a variety of immune cells such as T, B, natural killer (NK), and dendritic cells (2-5). However, it remained elusive whether or not and, if so, how surface molecules such as transmembrane receptors were transferred to other cells. The hypothetical idea of the nibbling of surface membranes was proposed by Hudrisier and colleagues in 2001 (6). In this study, it was shown that surface lipids and proteins were acquired with peptide-loaded MHC and T cell receptor and the phenomenon was named “trogocytosis” (3,6). After their findings, the concept has been generally accepted that surface receptors are transferred between immune cells via trogocytosis. In the recent publication by Hamieh and colleagues, a new role of trogocytosis in immune evasion has been demonstrated, in which tumor cells escape from killing during immune therapy by chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) (7).

CARs are artificially designed receptors that harbor one extracellular single chain variable fragment (scFv) domain that recognizes target cells and one to three cytosolic intercellular signaling domains derived from CD3ζ, costimulatory proteins such as CD28, and 4-1BB. Recognition of the target tumor cells by CAR-expressing T cells via the scFv domain causes activation of the signaling domains, which in turn elicit downstream effector activity, such as secretion of perforin, granzyme, and stimulation of Fas, to eliminate tumor cells. Adoptive transfer of CAR-expressing T cells showed impressive efficacy to B cell malignancies and was considered as a promising therapeutic measure (8). However, even though complete remission of tumor cells was observed, relapse was reported to occur because of loss or reduction of the tumor antigen on the leukemia cells and exhaustion and elimination of CAR T cells (9,10). Hamieh and colleagues showed that CD19, a B cell antigen, on the acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) cells (NALM6) was taken up by CAR T cells via trogocytosis and it is caused reduction of the tumor antigen (7). Subsequently, trogocytosed CD19 in the CAR T cell was transferred onto the CAR T cell surface. This B cell antigen expressing CAR T cell was recognized as malignant B cells and killed by other CAR T cells and it is called T cell fratricide (meaning “murdering one’s brother”) and eventually exhaustion of the CAR T cells (7). Although other mechanisms were reported for immune evasion of tumors from CAR T cells, such as antigen loss on the tumor cells caused by genetic mutation, alternative splicing, epitope shedding, or lineage switching (11), regulation of trogocytosis could be one of the potential therapeutic strategies.

Trogocytosis is not restricted to mammals. There were a number of reports that described trogocytosis in a wide range of eukaryotes from protists (synonymous to protozoa) to mammals (12). As early as in 1979, Brown and colleagues demonstrated by electron microscopy that the cytopathic mechanism, which was also referred as “trogocytosis”, of the free-living amoeba, Naegleria fowleri, by which the amoeba nibbled mouse embryonic cells (13). Similar trogocytosis-like ingestion of the target cells and trogocytosis-mediated cytopathic mechanisms have been reported from other free living and parasitic amoebas, such as Acanthamoeba, Dictyostelium, and Entamoeba (12,14). In addition, in the multicellular organisms, trogocytosis has also been reported to be involved in retinal development in Drosophila (15), primordial germ cell development in Caenorhabditis elegans (16), remodeling of synapses in Mus musculis (17), communication between mesenchymal stroma/stem-like cells and cancer cells in Homo sapiens (18), and spread of a intercellular pathogen Francisella tularensis between macrophages (19). In contrast to the cytopathic consequence of trogocytosis by protists, trogocytosis by multicellular organisms usually does not lead to killing of target cells. The concept is now well accepted that trogocytosis in multicellular organisms in general serves for intercellular communications. However, there are several notable exceptions. Trogocytosis was implicated in cytopathy by neutrophil and macrophages against cancer cells and the human genital parasitic protist, Trichomonas vaginalis (20-23).

A series of the reports on trogocytosis in various organisms suggest the sporadic existence of trogocytosis at least among the supergroup Unikonta (containing Opistokonta and Amoebozoa) of eukaryotes. Does trogocytosis in protists and multicellular organisms differ in the context of mechanisms and functions? A recent study on trogocytosis in the human intestinal protist, E. histolytica, the causative agent of amebiasis, demonstrated that amoebic trogocytosis may also serve for immune evasion (24). It was shown that an E. histolytica trophozoite which had trogocytosed Jurkat T cell was decorated with Jurkat T cell-derived membrane proteins such as class I MHC (24). E. histolytica trophozoites are exposed to complement during invasion and thus, protection from complement is indispensable for survival. This finding suggests trogocytosis in protists also serves as intercellular communication mechanism and way of decorating their surface with molecules stole form their neighbors.

To improve CAR T cell therapy, one potential approach will be regulating trogocytosis of CAR T cells. To this end, understand the molecular mechanisms is indispensable. Unfortunately, molecular basis of trogocytosis is not well clarified except for trogocytosis specific AGC family kinase in E. histolytica (25), most of the report showing molecules shared with phagocytosis (26). Studies of molecular basis of trogocytosis in model organisms and protists will provide novel drug target.


Funding: This work was supported in part by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan to T Nozaki (JP17K19416, and JP18H02650) and K Nakada-Tsukui (JP19H03463), Research Program on Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases from Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) to T Nozaki (JP18fk0108046) and K Nakada-Tsukui (JP19fk0108049j1103).


Provenance and Peer Review: This article was commissioned and reviewed by the Executive Editor-in-Chief Dr. Hualin Sun (Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Nantong, China).

Conflicts of Interest: Both authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at Dr. Nakada-Tsukui and Dr. Nozaki report grants from Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), grants from Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED), during the conduct of the study.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See:


  1. Cone RE, Sprent J, Marchalonis JJ. Antigen-binding specificity of isolated cell-surface immunoglobulin from thymus cells activated to histocompatibility antigens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1972;69:2556-60. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Huang JF, Yang Y, Sepulveda H, et al. TCR-Mediated internalization of peptide-MHC complexes acquired by T cells. Science 1999;286:952-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Joly E, Hudrisier D. What is trogocytosis and what is its purpose? Nat Immunol 2003;4:815. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Wakim LM, Bevan MJ. Cross-dressed dendritic cells drive memory CD8+ T-cell activation after viral infection. Nature 2011;471:629-32. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Aucher A, Magdeleine E, Joly E, et al. Capture of plasma membrane fragments from target cells by trogocytosis requires signaling in T cells but not B cells. Blood 2008;111:5621-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Hudrisier D, Riond J, Mazarguil H, et al. Cutting edge: CTLs rapidly capture membrane fragments from target cells in a TCR signaling-dependent manner. J Immunol 2001;166:3645-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Hamieh M, Dobrin A, Cabriolu A, et al. CAR T cell trogocytosis and cooperative killing regulate tumour antigen escape. Nature 2019;568:112-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Brudno JN, Kochenderfer JN. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies for lymphoma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2018;15:31-46. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Fry TJ, Shah NN, Orentas RJ, et al. CD22-targeted CAR T cells induce remission in B-ALL that is naive or resistant to CD19-targeted CAR immunotherapy. Nat Med 2018;24:20-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Caumartin J, Favier B, Daouya M, et al. Trogocytosis-based generation of suppressive NK cells. EMBO J 2007;26:1423-33. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Zheng S, Asnani M, Thomas-Tikhonenko A. Escape From ALL-CARTaz: Leukemia Immunoediting in the Age of Chimeric Antigen Receptors. Cancer J 2019;25:217-22. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Ralston KS. Taking a bite: Amoebic trogocytosis in Entamoeba histolytica and beyond. Curr Opin Microbiol 2015;28:26-35. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. Brown T. Observations by immunofluorescence microscopy and electron microscopy on the cytopathogenicity of Naegleria fowleri in mouse embryo-cell cultures. J Med Microbiol 1979;12:363-71. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  14. Ralston KS, Solga MD, Mackey-Lawrence NM, et al. Trogocytosis by Entamoeba histolytica contributes to cell killing and tissue invasion. Nature 2014;508:526-30. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  15. Cagan RL, Krämer H, Hart AC, et al. The bride of sevenless and sevenless interaction: internalization of a transmembrane ligand. Cell 1992;69:393-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  16. Abdu Y, Maniscalco C, Heddleston JM, et al. Developmentally programmed germ cell remodelling by endodermal cell cannibalism. Nat Cell Biol 2016;18:1302-10. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  17. Weinhard L, di Bartolomei G, Bolasco G, et al. Microglia remodel synapses by presynaptic trogocytosis and spine head filopodia induction. Nat Commun 2018;9:1228. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  18. Melzer C, von der Ohe J, Hass R. Concise Review: Crosstalk of Mesenchymal Stroma/Stem-Like Cells with Cancer Cells Provides Therapeutic Potential. Stem Cells 2018;36:951-68. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  19. Steele SP, Chamberlain Z, Park J, et al. Francisella tularensis enters a double membraned compartment following cell-cell transfer. Elife 2019; [Crossref] [PubMed]
  20. Matlung HL, Babes L, Zhao XW, et al. Neutrophils Kill Antibody-Opsonized Cancer Cells by Trogoptosis. Cell Rep 2018;23:3946-59.e6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  21. Valgardsdottir R, Cattaneo I, Klein C, et al. Human neutrophils mediate trogocytosis rather than phagocytosis of CLL B cells opsonized with anti-CD20 antibodies. Blood 2017;129:2636-44. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  22. Mercer F, Ng SH, Brown TM, et al. Neutrophils kill the parasite Trichomonas vaginalis using trogocytosis. PLoS Biol 2018;16:e2003885 [Crossref] [PubMed]
  23. Velmurugan R, Challa DK, Ram S, et al. Macrophage-Mediated Trogocytosis Leads to Death of Antibody-Opsonized Tumor Cells. Mol Cancer Ther 2016;15:1879-89. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  24. Miller HW, Suleiman RL, Ralston KS. Trogocytosis by Entamoeba histolytica Mediates Acquisition and Display of Human Cell Membrane Proteins and Evasion of Lysis by Human Serum. MBio 2019; [Crossref] [PubMed]
  25. Somlata Nakada-Tsukui K. Nozaki T. AGC family kinase 1 participates in trogocytosis but not in phagocytosis in Entamoeba histolytica. Nat Commun 2017;8:101. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  26. Martínez-Martín N, Fernández-Arenas E, Cemerski S, et al. T cell receptor internalization from the immunological synapse is mediated by TC21 and RhoG GTPase-dependent phagocytosis. Immunity 2011;35:208-22. [Crossref] [PubMed]
doi: 10.21037/biotarget.2020.03.02
Cite this article as: Nakada-Tsukui K, Nozaki T. The emerging role of trogocytosis in the evasion of cancers and parasitic protists from immune cells. Biotarget 2020;4:4.

Download Citation